fbpx
WhatsApp

Medical Grade Monitor and Benefits

Fact checked by Esun

Table of Contents

With the advances in medical science, doctors have become more and more dependent on imaging technology to do their job well. However, the differences in over-the-shelf and medical displays mean that choosing the right equipment is crucial.

Too much is at stake when using an older, inferior, or outdated imaging system when errors can result in misdiagnosis, or worse. This is why the right medical-grade monitor will help physicians make the right diagnosis and save lives.

So, what is the right medical-grade monitor, then? There is no all-included solution for all medical departments and with all the options available, it can be hard to choose the right medical-grade monitor.

Clinical Review

Clinical-ReviewMedical specialists will usually need a second medical-grade monitor for PACS quality and modality control. Even though the majority of the work is done on the first monitor, the second monitor can be used for patient edutainment, office work, and image acquisition.

By using medical-grade monitors for both your displays, you can ensure consistent image quality, efficient IT solutions, and accurate reproductions.

Touch screen capabilities in medical monitors can remove the need for peripheral devices, such as a mouse or keyboard, reducing the mess caused by wires. This in turn improves patient safety.

Impact on Physician Confidence

Physician-Confidence

Medical grade monitors improve diagnostic accuracy by physicians, according to Albert Xthona. He affirms that even though medical monitors do have a higher price tag than commercial displays, the medical solution is less expensive in the short and long term when considering their professional yield.

The ability of medical monitors to show specific details and display a full-color palette, as well as shades of gray in bright images. Doctors using consumer-grade could risk misinterpreting due to misinterpretation, risking their patient safety. Accuracy is paramount to physicians, and they may be uneasy to sacrifice the performance of medical-grade monitors.

“Studies show that radiologists come to the correct interpretation more quickly with medical displays. [Studies] also indicate that there is more certainty with the better displays as found in the lower number of false positives and less time spent on viewing them.”

Consumer-Grade vs. Medical-Grade Displays

Consumer-Grade -Medical-GradeFor over two decades, LED monitors have started replacing traditional CRT monitors for diagnostic imaging. Their thinner display size reduced energy needs and improved flat panel resolution improved made them quick to be adopted by radiologists.

Nonetheless, improvement in consumer-grade monitors seems to have narrowed the gap between them and medical monitors. The 4K Ultra HD displays are extremely high resolution and appeal to medical practitioners looking to save money.

Even then, medical monitors are still seen as superior in a medical context for a few key reasons.

  • Consistency. Even though consumer monitors are narrowing the gap in terms of resolution, accurate image reproduction is not consistent. While not as crucial in an office or video game context, consistent image quality reproduction is necessary for a medical context.
  • Diagnostic requirements. Manufacturers of medical monitors put their focus on creating products that display small details, contrary to less precise consumer monitors.
  • Warranties. Companies that manufacture medical monitors usually offer longer warranties than consumer-grade manufacturers.
  • Reduced Eye Fatigue – ambient light levels in medical monitors is designed to reduce eye fatigue and increase diagnostic accuracy.

While they possess a lower price tag, the cost of operation, polyvalence, the need to replace consumer-grade monitors more frequently, and their inability to meet all the needs for diagnosis make them not worth their money in the long term.

Consumer Grade Cautions

Consumer-grade-monitorThere are considerations against consumer-grade monitor usage for diagnostic needs for physicians. The rise of the popularity of COTS, caused primarily by the financial incentive, has adversely affected patient safety, according to the NEC.

Even though they are cheaper, the return on investment with medical monitors is greater than COTS, due to longer lifespan, higher luminance, and extended warranties and DICOM standards.

The ability to see radiography irregularities is linked to the display capacity to show small details, the aptness to show different shades of grey, and produce consistent bright images.

Life Span

life-time-spanMedical displays need to maintain consistent brightness and remain artifacts-free throughout their lifetime. This means they are expected to last at least 5 years of “normal” use, which can mean continual usage without degradation in image quality and performance.

Even though consumer monitors can give you the impression that they possess all your needs, they will inevitably fail in the long term. Medical monitors are the only monitors that ensure consistently high brightness over their entire lifetime and compliance with medical standards.

This is why medical monitors come with a longer warranty period, lasting up to 3 to 5 years. Furthermore, advanced quality assurance, coupled with intelligent maintenance data ease prolonging the longevity of your product.

Shenzhen Beacon Display Technology Co., Ltd.

medical-display-technologyIn terms of medical display technology, this is why I use Shenzhen Beacon Display Technology. Their high-tech and innovative products provide medical monitors to the medical industry throughout 68 countries in the world.

Their medical displays read allow me to do my job with greater confidence, speed, and precision. Why? Because their medical-grade imaging solutions offer high accuracy, quality, grayscale, and are conform to DICOM standards.

Consistency in image brightness, clarity, and a broader spectrum of grayscale guarantee our team homogenous medical images during the lifespan of the monitors, but also on every display that is connected to the network. This permits colleagues in different wings can see identical images, facilitating accurate remote collaboration.

Liquid-crystal display (LCD) panels, more often than not, suffer from inherent display imperfections, known as “noise”. Shenzhen Beacon Display Technology monitors tackle those issues via integrated display technologies, providing consistent brightness and grayscale visualization.

Shenzhen Beacon Display Technology makes the most cutting-edge and methodical medical-grade monitors available, ensuring me and my team here at Nano Medic Care have the most reliable and long-lasting tools to do our job well. For more information about quality medical monitors or other benefits from buying from Nano Medic Care, please contact us here.

Your form could not be saved. Please refresh the page and try again.
Your form has been successful submitted.

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Nano Medic Care (NMC) Fact-Checking Standards

The Nano Medic Care (NMC) team is committed to providing content that meets the highest editorial standards for accuracy, source, and unbiased analysis. Every article is completely fact-checked by our professional network members from the healthcare industry. Additionally, we do not tolerate any level of plagiarism, unethical or malicious intent from our authors, editors, and contributors.

  1. All articles are required to include relevant background information and context with the particular condition or topic.
  2. All subjects, quotes, and data statistics used inside an article must provide a reference or link to the original source. We make sure content indicates why any statistics presented are relevant.
  3. All content associated with new prescriptions, practice, procedures, etcetera must describe with full clarity the availability, treatment target, pricing, undesired side effects, known interactions, and off-label use, if appropriate.
  4. All referenced studies and research documents or reports should be from reputable and relevant peer-reviewed journals, professionals, or academic associations.
  5. Any potential conflicts intriguing related to some study or source should be clearly indicated to the reader.
  6. All articles must include an authentic review from more than two qualified specialists with appropriate credentials and links to relevant associations or published works.Nano Medic Care